FOI Domestic Abuse 999 Calls (0590-2022/23)
Request
Q1. Of 999 calls reporting domestic abuse: Please provide the total number of occasions that police did not attend
- i) grade 1,
- ii) grade 2 or
iii) grade 3 emergencies for each financial year from 2017-18 up to and including the current financial year until 31 Aug 2022.
Q2. Of 999 calls reporting domestic burglary, vehicle-related crime, theft from the person and robbery: Please group these crime types together and provide the same information requested in Question 1 above.
Response
Extent and Result of Searches to Locate Information
To locate the information relevant to your request searches were conducted within North Yorkshire Police. I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by North Yorkshire Police.
Decision
I have today decided to disclose the located information to you.
Q1. Please see the below table which shows the number of ‘Domestic’ 999 calls received where there was no police attendance, broken down by financial year from 1 April 2018.
|
Priority |
2018/2019 |
2019/2020 |
2020/2021 |
2021/2022 |
|
Immediate Rural |
11 |
14 |
5 |
12 |
|
Immediate Urban |
9 |
13 |
10 |
16 |
|
Priority |
59 |
53 |
82 |
133 |
|
Scheduled |
50 |
38 |
17 |
52 |
|
Total |
129 |
118 |
114 |
213 |
Q2. The number of domestic burglary, vehicle-related crime, theft from the person and robbery 999 calls received where there was no police attendance from 1 April 2018 is 2.
Section 40 – Personal Information
I am exempting the annual breakdown of these individual incidents pursuant to Section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act). Where an individual can be identified by such data, releasing it would clearly breach the first data protection principle of being ‘fair’ to the data subject.
Section 17 of the Act requires North Yorkshire Police, when refusing to provide such information (because the information is exempt) to provide you the applicant with a notice which: (a) states that fact, (b) specifies the exemption in question and (c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption applies.
Section 40(2) is an absolute class based exemption, which does not require a public interest test, but requires the balancing of the legitimate interests of the public against the interests of the individual under the first Data Protection Principle; in that processing of personal data must be lawful and fair (DPA 2018 35(1), EUGDPR Article 5(1)).
This exemption applies because the right given under the FOI Act to request official information held by public authorities does not apply to the personal data of third parties where disclosure of that information would not be fair to the individual, and where there is no legitimate public interest in disclosure.
In all the circumstances of the case it has been determined that the duty to the individual under the Data Protection Act 2018 & EU General Data Protection Regulations, and the public interest in maintaining the exemption from disclosure of personal information held by the force in such instances, outweighs the public interest in disclosure. In this instance, personal information can only be disclosed to the individual concerned.
Releasing personal details to a person other than the data subject would not only breach the data subject’s Data Protection rights it may also breach the obligations placed on an authority under the European Convention on Human Rights.
Pursuant to Section 17(1) of the Act this letter acts as a refusal notice under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in relation to your request.
Please note that systems used for recording information are not generic, nor are the procedures used locally in capturing the data. It should be noted therefore that this force’s response to your questions should not be used for comparison purposes with any other responses you may receive.