Leave this site
We use some essential cookies to make our website work. We’d like to set additional cookies so we can remember your preferences and understand how you use our site.
You can manage your preferences and cookie settings at any time by clicking on “Customise Cookies” below. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Cookies notice.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Your cookie preferences have been saved. You can update your cookie settings at any time on the cookies page.
Sorry, there was a technical problem. Please try again.
This site is a beta, which means it's a work in progress and we'll be adding more to it over the next few weeks. Your feedback helps us make things better, so please let us know what you think.
A misconduct hearing took place on 22nd and 23rd September 2026. Having considered medical evidence, the Chair of the hearing determined that it was to take place in private. He determined that there would be a significant risk of serious harm to the health of a third party (who was not involved in the events to which the allegations relate) if the hearing or detailed findings were public. The panel made a finding of gross misconduct and that the officer would have been dismissed had they still been serving. They will be placed on the statutory police barred list.